Interesting to see more simulators out there, but this one is very buggy still - it crashed just because I was clicking on a random province in my country. And sure enough, the map is far better done that say Power & Revolution or Paradox Games, but the game itself crashes for no reason and the relationship status between countries seem odd. Also the way it describes governments makes no sense at all.
I am not sure what your problem is, but since I am not here to treat psychological issues:
It is a well known fact that Paradox Games have notoriously inaccurate provinces, down to having real world cities as provinces, bad province placements (one of the huge sources of border gore) and even made up provinces just so they can fit within the game.
If you look at the provinces in this game, they are directly taken from real world maps. So yes, they are better. Do they look better? Subjective. Are they a better representation of real world provinces? Absolutely.
Edit: Also, Power & Revolution also has the province problem, albeit with smaller countries. They just do not bother putting those in the map at all, so if you want to see the subdivisions of say, Albania or Uruguay there are none. Those countries are just one small provinces.
first things first, stop liking your own stuff... thats cringe af....
Second there is like 150 Countries missing... tf r u talking bout? Woooow, you know where the most important countries are in the world???? thats soooo cooooool..
Just so you know, HOI4, CK3 and Vic3 has the same places for their countries? Vic3 also has Cities that evolve while playing. Tf r u talking bout, stop being an idiot if you dont know shit
I did not like my own comments, please stop being so paranoid.
You say '150' countries are missing, but I looked at the map and that is just false. Which countries are missing? The only ones seem to be microstates, but there is Andorra so perhaps they will be added later on. All countries even smaller ones have correct province placements.
HOI4, CK3, and Vic3 do not actually have the same countries due to being different time periods and different polities existing in their periods. Hell in CK3 nation-states as such do not exist (perhaps the Eastern Roman Empire... But that would be it). They also have different provinces for each game, too.
By the way, who is talking about cities advancing or not? I said cities are not provinces, not that they cannot be developed.
But they are not missing, they are just unplayable at the moment. Most African countries are there, properly mapped and all. You just cannot interact with them.
And you are right on that point, they need to make these countries playable. But the game is an alpha/beta, they should get around to it eventually.
But that is beside what I said, which is that the map is more accurate than in other games. It might not yet be entirely playable, but does not mean there is no effort being put into it.
https://igg-games.com/request-pcgames-pc6.html
All comments asking for updates have been deleted. Any further comments asking for updates will also be deleted.
It is a well known fact that Paradox Games have notoriously inaccurate provinces, down to having real world cities as provinces, bad province placements (one of the huge sources of border gore) and even made up provinces just so they can fit within the game.
If you look at the provinces in this game, they are directly taken from real world maps. So yes, they are better. Do they look better? Subjective. Are they a better representation of real world provinces? Absolutely.
Edit: Also, Power & Revolution also has the province problem, albeit with smaller countries. They just do not bother putting those in the map at all, so if you want to see the subdivisions of say, Albania or Uruguay there are none. Those countries are just one small provinces.
Second there is like 150 Countries missing... tf r u talking bout? Woooow, you know where the most important countries are in the world???? thats soooo cooooool..
Just so you know, HOI4, CK3 and Vic3 has the same places for their countries? Vic3 also has Cities that evolve while playing. Tf r u talking bout, stop being an idiot if you dont know shit
You say '150' countries are missing, but I looked at the map and that is just false. Which countries are missing? The only ones seem to be microstates, but there is Andorra so perhaps they will be added later on. All countries even smaller ones have correct province placements.
HOI4, CK3, and Vic3 do not actually have the same countries due to being different time periods and different polities existing in their periods. Hell in CK3 nation-states as such do not exist (perhaps the Eastern Roman Empire... But that would be it). They also have different provinces for each game, too.
By the way, who is talking about cities advancing or not? I said cities are not provinces, not that they cannot be developed.
"World economy" does not work if over 60% is missing.
And you are right on that point, they need to make these countries playable. But the game is an alpha/beta, they should get around to it eventually.
But that is beside what I said, which is that the map is more accurate than in other games. It might not yet be entirely playable, but does not mean there is no effort being put into it.
Its not bad after all, but its a bug fest and is has alot to fix before even thinking about leaving early access.