Please can you shut the fuck up retarded asshole?? Did you patriobitch, conserfagtive, natiocock-slutiatist got enough rapings from Soviets?? Did you enjoyed when 2 million bitches from germany got their pussies torn apart in streets and fields?? Did you feel the Stasi executions and the rapings you Westernleech pedoslugs had?? Did you also feel it when we mass executed you similar degenerates in China,Korea,Vietnam,Cuba and going on?? I hope they suffered as Pogrom isn't ever enough for you abvominations of nature! Go suck your nazbitch crotch and leave history and capabilities to the REAL winners patriothole!
The self appointed representative of the biggest losers in history, speaking about how to be a "real" winner... Talks about a lack of self awarness. Is there anything you guys haven't lost in life ? Including your lifes and dignities (implying you had any to begin with, a huge assumption i know). When you can't even remember how pathetically you little gay club ended, that's how you know you're clinically retarded. You don't even exist anymore, every former communist country is now capitalist and nationalist, and it puts your kind in reeducation camps. Especially China ;-) Even your gay victories wouldn't have been possible without capitalist's help, you're everyone's bitches. How do we normal people feel when you retards mass execute yourselves everytime your dumb ideologies go sour ? We feel pretty great, at least you're self-removeable garbage xDDD
Through the Darkest of Times is Adventure, Simulation, Strategy, Management, Point & Click game as u can all see above pics. Good game based on Nazi and Hitler. Game works fine. Point and click decision making. ⭐⭐⭐
Great game from smart indie devs that very well know the importance of historical responsibility..not to be confused with terms like "guilt complex" or any other retarded neologisms issued by the alt right.^
solid mechanics - though there is room for optimization
sort of transpicuous pacing and managing options: this game will not appeal to the hardcore crowd, especially not to the ones with a vivid background in (analog) boardgames ;)
Great Art Style. Always bear in mind: Aesthetics is truth in art. It is NOT a matter of taste...
Ok so tell me what it does mean for you ? I read it four times (4) and even followed some of the cliff notes. And I can't see anything else but what I said. I'm probably not smart enough to get it. Educate me.
You were talking about THAT ?!? And what am I supposed to deduce from it ? I asked you already what is the point you're trying to make with it ? Faurison is trying to discredit Hilberg by pointing out his use of one idiom in one sentence '("mind-reading") out of one book, and rolling with it to prove Hilberg is wrong about everything. Hillberg used it in the figurative way for dramatic effect : I doubt such a scholar believes in ESP. He never said anything about it - publicly or otherwise. Prove me wrong. So Faurison basically takes a figurative expression out of it's context, reads it literally and infers a deep meaning from that nugget that the guy is wrong about the holocaust ! Seems ok to you ? Is it good argumentation about facts ? If I point one of your grammatical mistakes or hype expressions ("GLAADite, "Jew psychology") and use it to deduce that you are wrong, is it ok ? Not to me.
No link about it in any of your previous posts. Now you're outright lying. A new low. You started by obfuscating facts and confusing them with opinions. Now you're lying. Bad human.
Lots to unpack here - aside from insults that is. But I still can't. You still haven't got the hang of sourcing and facts. Can't argue without them ! You need to show me a source for Hilberg's denial of the chambers - quoting him saying so or from one of his books ? - and then you can conclude he's useless as a source. For now it's just a childish tantrum "I'm right because I'm sure I am and I say so". I'll be nice and let the insults slide but try to behave. I'm not your mom.
You're losing an argument with an autistic ? That must sting a little !!! Anyway, the burden of proof lies with the one making the argument. That's how it works. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy) "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (Carl Sagan,1980) Stop being dense - source it and let's debate then. You seem eager. Or as usual : flee and/or block me. And/or change profile. People like you always end up doing that. I wonder why ..? I love the smell of blocked profiles in the mornin'. Smells like ... victory.
Still.no.quote.or.source. Proposition - ok. But that's it. The one bringing an argument to the table must support it, not the other way around ! Please. Let's have a proper discussion. Your move.
No. Wrong again ! Proposition first, then quote and/or source. What is the point you're trying to make by quoting a notorious french revisionist I wonder (Faurison of all people...) ? Is it that revisionists are a bunch of wackos with far fetched theories based on nothing ? Cause, we knoooow. But if it's not your point please do enlighten me. Refer to my example above for a way to properly debate and let's go ! I grow weary of mocking your form - I'd rather blast your arguments proper. We got sidetracked here.
Still no source ..? Man you are a slow learner. No wonder you dropped out of school ! Here is how it works : Proposition then Quote then Source. Like : There were roughly 6M death in camps during the holocaust.
Most research confirms that the number of victims was between five and six million. Early calculations range from 5.1 million (the Holocaust researcher Raul Hilberg) to 5.95 million (the demographer Jacob Leschinsky). source : https://www.yadvashem.org/archive/hall-of-names/database/faq.html You can then check the source, if I quoted it correctly and if it's reliable. And since the quote contains 2 names you can then jump and search them directly to check their credibility. That's how argumentation works. Verifiable intel. Any questions ?
Yeah - 1.1M in Auschwitz. True. https://www.history.com/news/auschwitz-concentration-camp-numbers But do you know there were like multiple camps around at the time (at least 8 in Europe alone)? So, if it's 1.1M death in one - ... I'll give you a couple of days to figure the math. About the reconstruction malarkey ... Source ? You know if you announce something you must have a source ! "Apparent" for whom ? And "apparent" where ? Any pic ?Maybe you don't need solid proof as long as it serves your narrative. Scholars need it even when they agree with the argument. It's called ob.jec.ti.vi.ty. Dirty word, I know. As for me being a member of (something something dark side) - I don't know how you got there ? Source ..? And you didn't use you trademark exit !!! You know "Jews are so smart". Not so proud of it anymore ? You are so smart. And brave.
Source ? Cause you know the official number is still 10M people including 6M Jews. No need for a source you can read it almost anywhere. Where do your get your number from ? Cause you know, unconsciously propagating nonsense apparently doesn't make you a better person. But consciously propagating falsehoods makes you a very nasty one. And I bet dollars to doughnuts you'll be gone with the wind without even answering. Which would prove my point. EDIT You really are a piece of work hey ? Found this among your recent comments
Pedophilia is predominantly a faggot thing, which is why Jew Psychology activists accuse the opposition of being pedophiles You have no clue about anything do you ? You probably shouldn't have ditched school. It shows. You are so smart.
Yeah, poor National Socialist party. Unjustly persecuted. People can be so mean sometimes with mass genocidal sectarian movements. I can't fathom why. We should just forget this ever happened. Better for future generations, ain't it ? And then it can happen again ! What fun that would be.
I wasn't aware of the story until you mentioned it and I looked around. TIL They gave an explanation - German company, promote peace and all that - but I'm not sure where I stand about this. If the original game had symbols then why take them away ? It suspiciously looks like censorship to me. Moreso because they apparently removed "burning enemies" too. Weird European PCness.
that remaster was honestly a total dogshit not only for the censorship but also for using a different engine they could just update the old commandos 2 engine and make the HD like the destination paris mod
I can install the game all well and good, but when I press any of the buttons in the menu (New Game, Settings...), the screen goes a bit darker and a white "loading" icon appears in the top right. Won't go away and I can't do anything. Any ideas? I've applied the crack, so it should be working.
Did you check if your anti V. doesn't silently blocks/erases the files ? They sometimes do that the sneaky buggers. EDIT works perfectly on my end - the release seems ok.
I'm pretty sure it didn't block/erase anything. This ain't my first rodeo, however, it seems like there's nothing I can do, I tried everything. Oh well. Maybe I'll try again later.
I was absolutely not making any fun of the game at all. Quite the opposite. It's because it seems a pretty serious game that I'm being wary. You know what you usually get when you mix serious WWII historical topics with free comments of the web right ..?
I know you weren't trying to make fun of this game, What I'm saying is that some games are just stupid and can't be taken seriuosly like that one Zombie Nazi or whatever the name was
Right; yeah that one must be really something judging by the title. "Tired of shooting them ? Screw them instead !" So many Nazis and so little time ...
Why are you worried what trolls and kids will comment? Historical or not, comments should be open for every game, no matter how insightful, helpful or irrelevant the comment is.
Agreed 100% - I wasn't worrying or seriously asking for closed comments just foreshadowing the likely flavor of future posts. It has happened befooooooore...
Is there anything you guys haven't lost in life ? Including your lifes and dignities (implying you had any to begin with, a huge assumption i know). When you can't even remember how pathetically you little gay club ended, that's how you know you're clinically retarded.
You don't even exist anymore, every former communist country is now capitalist and nationalist, and it puts your kind in reeducation camps. Especially China ;-) Even your gay victories wouldn't have been possible without capitalist's help, you're everyone's bitches.
How do we normal people feel when you retards mass execute yourselves everytime your dumb ideologies go sour ? We feel pretty great, at least you're self-removeable garbage xDDD
I read it four times (4) and even followed some of the cliff notes.
And I can't see anything else but what I said.
I'm probably not smart enough to get it.
Educate me.
And what am I supposed to deduce from it ?
I asked you already what is the point you're trying to make with it ?
Faurison is trying to discredit Hilberg by pointing out his use of one idiom in one sentence '("mind-reading") out of one book, and rolling with it to prove Hilberg is wrong about everything.
Hillberg used it in the figurative way for dramatic effect : I doubt such a scholar believes in ESP. He never said anything about it - publicly or otherwise. Prove me wrong.
So Faurison basically takes a figurative expression out of it's context, reads it literally and infers a deep meaning from that nugget that the guy is wrong about the holocaust !
Seems ok to you ? Is it good argumentation about facts ?
If I point one of your grammatical mistakes or hype expressions ("GLAADite, "Jew psychology") and use it to deduce that you are wrong, is it ok ?
Not to me.
Now you're outright lying.
A new low. You started by obfuscating facts and confusing them with opinions. Now you're lying.
Bad human.
You need to show me a source for Hilberg's denial of the chambers - quoting him saying so or from one of his books ? - and then you can conclude he's useless as a source.
For now it's just a childish tantrum "I'm right because I'm sure I am and I say so".
I'll be nice and let the insults slide but try to behave. I'm not your mom.
Anyway, the burden of proof lies with the one making the argument.
That's how it works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (Carl Sagan,1980)
Stop being dense - source it and let's debate then. You seem eager.
Or as usual : flee and/or block me. And/or change profile. People like you always end up doing that. I wonder why ..?
I love the smell of blocked profiles in the mornin'. Smells like ... victory.
Proposition - ok. But that's it. The one bringing an argument to the table must support it, not the other way around !
Please. Let's have a proper discussion.
Your move.
Proposition first, then quote and/or source.
What is the point you're trying to make by quoting a notorious french revisionist I wonder (Faurison of all people...) ? Is it that revisionists are a bunch of wackos with far fetched theories based on nothing ?
Cause, we knoooow.
But if it's not your point please do enlighten me. Refer to my example above for a way to properly debate and let's go !
I grow weary of mocking your form - I'd rather blast your arguments proper. We got sidetracked here.
Here is how it works :
Proposition then Quote then Source.
Like :
There were roughly 6M death in camps during the holocaust.
Most research confirms that the number of victims was between five and six million. Early calculations range from 5.1 million (the Holocaust researcher Raul Hilberg) to 5.95 million (the demographer Jacob Leschinsky).
source : https://www.yadvashem.org/archive/hall-of-names/database/faq.html
You can then check the source, if I quoted it correctly and if it's reliable. And since the quote contains 2 names you can then jump and search them directly to check their credibility. That's how argumentation works. Verifiable intel.
Any questions ?
https://www.history.com/news/auschwitz-concentration-camp-numbers
But do you know there were like multiple camps around at the time (at least 8 in Europe alone)? So, if it's 1.1M death in one - ... I'll give you a couple of days to figure the math.
About the reconstruction malarkey ... Source ? You know if you announce something you must have a source !
"Apparent" for whom ? And "apparent" where ? Any pic ?Maybe you don't need solid proof as long as it serves your narrative. Scholars need it even when they agree with the argument.
It's called ob.jec.ti.vi.ty.
Dirty word, I know.
As for me being a member of (something something dark side) - I don't know how you got there ? Source ..?
And you didn't use you trademark exit !!! You know "Jews are so smart". Not so proud of it anymore ?
You are so smart. And brave.
Where do your get your number from ?
Cause you know, unconsciously propagating nonsense apparently doesn't make you a better person.
But consciously propagating falsehoods makes you a very nasty one.
And I bet dollars to doughnuts you'll be gone with the wind without even answering. Which would prove my point.
EDIT You really are a piece of work hey ? Found this among your recent comments
Pedophilia is predominantly a faggot thing, which is why Jew Psychology activists accuse the opposition of being pedophiles
You have no clue about anything do you ? You probably shouldn't have ditched school. It shows.
You are so smart.
We should just forget this ever happened. Better for future generations, ain't it ? And then it can happen again !
What fun that would be.
shame on commandos 2 HD remaster
TIL
They gave an explanation - German company, promote peace and all that - but I'm not sure where I stand about this.
If the original game had symbols then why take them away ? It suspiciously looks like censorship to me. Moreso because they apparently removed "burning enemies" too.
Weird European PCness.
they could just update the old commandos 2 engine and make the HD like the destination paris mod
Any ideas? I've applied the crack, so it should be working.
EDIT works perfectly on my end - the release seems ok.
You know what you usually get when you mix serious WWII historical topics with free comments of the web right ..?
And Zombie Nazis should ALWAYS be taken seriously.
But I get your point.
"Tired of shooting them ?
Screw them instead !"
So many Nazis and so little time ...
It has happened befooooooore...