The funny thing about democracy I guess, is that its "mob rules" right? The majority should decide and vote for the rules that best represent them. But what if you let criminals into your community, and they start voting for rules to represent their own crimes. Then it just fails internally. You let a bunch of inmates in and took over the asylum. There has to be a certain amount of cultural root. That even if the world changes and things evolve, a base value system that defines the culture. We love a free market, but anarchy isn't really a culture. If you think it is get yourself a pirate ship and hit the sea's and see how long the world around you puts up with that. Some people think that "democracy" is their right to behave like its a pirate ship. AND have people around them who maintain the host culture with rules and morality and behavior that it takes to build a culture, pay the rent for them to behave as a criminal.
There is no way on earth you could create a game like this without extreme bias programmed in. If the creators favor socialism (blah), socialist positions are obviously going to be more rewarding.
who knew that enacting policies that benefit the population rather than corporations are actualy popular among the population. guess you learn something new everyday huh.
It's not "caused by socialism" per se, but it's mainly caused by the govt's negligent decisions to overly rely on oil and they lacked invests in numerous sectors, including food infrastructure. They just import like crazy with oil money.
As you wish to name it. But tell it to them. In fact, tell it to all who have undergone through all those "this was not true communism" regimes. Fuck, man, many many many attempts, and still haven't managed to achieve that "true communism"...
(Lol I'm here to explain commie process to you, not giving you English lectures.) It depends on how you view it, but Khmer Rouge's Kampuchea (I refuse to call them "Democratic" Kampuchea) is communistic by society, but they failed miserably. Why? They're politically paranoid, they're ethnic ultranationalists (go ask Vietnamese people) and they ignored all the steps needed to achieve communism, instead they used the tactics from the Great Leap Forward which was proven a failure.
Too much text and same answer as ever: "wasn't true communism". How many attempts have been made? Because none has been ever "true communism". Perhaps something's fundamentally wrong there.
and still those countries with the lowest crime rates care the most about their poor people but retarded conservatives dont understand that that concept is to high for their small brains to grasp
Well, i'm from Brazil, and Venezuela's borders touches ours. And, yes, socialism have failed them, as it did throughout the history, and they came in masses trying to make a living in Brasil, which is not a model of capitalism to beging with. They had no paper to wipe their arses, they had to eat garbage and eat their own dogs. And, yes, socialism is fucking every country on south america up, including Brasil, that, while PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores "Labor's Party) ruled as presidents (Lula and Dilma), our economy got fucked up real bad, we are still paying the light bills from when Dilma decided that market should not say how much light would coast. She would. Brazil have a ton of state-owned companies that's only good for politics. While politics can put whoever they want working on them, we, the people, have to split the losses while paying 35$ for Correios (state-owned "Fedex-like") so they can deliver a book. Now Argentina is following their steps, going same way, with rising inflation and the whole agenda. So, yes, socialism is no good for no country, only for the ones who have the power.
and the opposite give more to the wealthy and law help them to sink other into deep poverty and dual speed healthcare. and make the change not reversible via election funding pro business.
From what I have seen as far as legitimate proof (what is successful), there is a bias for moderation (which is not too weird) but that seems to be it.
The majority should decide and vote for the rules that best represent them.
But what if you let criminals into your community,
and they start voting for rules to represent their own crimes.
Then it just fails internally.
You let a bunch of inmates in and took over the asylum.
There has to be a certain amount of cultural root.
That even if the world changes and things evolve, a base value system that defines the culture.
We love a free market, but anarchy isn't really a culture.
If you think it is get yourself a pirate ship and hit the sea's and see how long the world around you puts up with that.
Some people think that "democracy" is their right to behave like its a pirate ship.
AND have people around them who maintain the host culture with rules and morality and behavior that it takes to build a culture, pay the rent for them to behave as a criminal.
Objective : Clear USA debt !
I has 22 Tn left... (O o")
guess you learn something new everyday huh.
It depends on how you view it, but Khmer Rouge's Kampuchea (I refuse to call them "Democratic" Kampuchea) is communistic by society, but they failed miserably. Why? They're politically paranoid, they're ethnic ultranationalists (go ask Vietnamese people) and they ignored all the steps needed to achieve communism, instead they used the tactics from the Great Leap Forward which was proven a failure.
but retarded conservatives dont understand that
that concept is to high for their small brains to grasp
And, yes, socialism is fucking every country on south america up, including Brasil, that, while PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores "Labor's Party) ruled as presidents (Lula and Dilma), our economy got fucked up real bad, we are still paying the light bills from when Dilma decided that market should not say how much light would coast. She would.
Brazil have a ton of state-owned companies that's only good for politics. While politics can put whoever they want working on them, we, the people, have to split the losses while paying 35$ for Correios (state-owned "Fedex-like") so they can deliver a book.
Now Argentina is following their steps, going same way, with rising inflation and the whole agenda. So, yes, socialism is no good for no country, only for the ones who have the power.