Fix for those who dropped the v0.4.08.06 files into a previous game version folder and cant play because the character doesnt move:
extract the v0.4.08.06 version files again, but this time on its own folder and not on a previous game version folder go to the folder where you dropped the files on the first time (i.e. the one where the previous version was i.e. the one you cant play because the character cant move) Zelter_Data -> copy the folder dtb (this is where your save game files are) go to v0.4.08.06 folder (the fresh one) Zelter_Data -> drop the coppied dtb folder here play the game from the new v0.4.08.06 folder (you can delete the previous version folder you used to play from) I recommend doing this for every new update copy your previous dtb folder to the new version folder
v0.4.08.06 does not work for me, I get an error when I try to run it, does anyone else have the same problem? Confirmed: From what I saw, it takes DirectX 10 and Windows 10 to work ... and I have Windows 7.
"just a heads up as of patch 4.05 any save larger than 40 days will corrupt past that date." -hmm wanna play this current version (4.05) tho... BUT if this will stop on your 40days, nah..way~~
just a heads up as of patch 4.05 any save larger than 40 days will corrupt past that date. from all the posts ive found almost everyone who got that far either their save just stopped loading or they stopped being able to save or like my your game drops to 3 frames a sec and you become an un animated sprite that slides around when you move. this game has serious potential. its game loop is crazy addictive i played it strait from start to unplayable without 1 single break. i got about 8 hours out of it. so you should treat this game as demo
the setting keeps changing when you back to main menu ~ like keybind or graphic setting
random bug, like my character stuck at one motion and cant do anything except load the game
random reset, like i had this one save file had 30 days alive but when i load back all my progress lose, my name changed, and back to start after all ~ still not full game but had potential.
8gbs its the standard no it's not you retard, it means the game has crap PC optimization not that 'muh more gbs = better' bs normies constantly spout on social media
at this years like 90% of the people have a PC with at least 8 GBs, its no longer expensive like it was 5-6 years ago, so really if you can afford that, shame on you and second its an early access game not a full gama release, you kids seems to dont understand the meaning of that
It just means that this game has no ability to scale down the graphics or lower the cache amount used on the RAM. You could also say that this takes into consideration integrated graphics since it also uses RAM as graphics memory. Also, most modern games can run on a 2-4 GB computer but they either look like shit or they run like shit. I would say you can actually run this game while having a lower amount of ram than suggested but expect it to run like shit.
Perhaps 8gb is enough as long as you have an slightly good gpu and an average processor? say i5 and alike, we all talk about ram but nobody notices how the recommended is a fucking i7
Not everyone is from burger land and can afford such expensive shit, the comp I had last year before I got a new one ran winxp 32bit with 1 gb and a few megs lol
I'm a "junior" how? You're insulting me because you're broke and can't afford a decent system? I don't get personal until other people do first. What's your issue?
You look bad talking to the idiot, it shows that your parents do not give you for video games and that is why you resort to this website, if you had a lot of money you would buy the games on Steam, I download from this page because I have low economic resources obviously.
I don't live with my parents there idiot. The only idiot here is you making assumptions being an ass hole because you're broke and can't afford decent specs. I'm 26 and have my own apartment as well as 2k a month worth of bills. I actually do buy games from steam if i support the developers. Thanks though princess, you're adorable
Please dude, don't tell more. ¡¡You'are a mongoloid!! I have job and responsibilites. It is obvious that the difference between you and me is that I do my own thing, unlike you, that you believe a lot with your cpu gamer that your parents have bought for you or your suggar daddy.
What's a cpu gamer? Are you trying to say PC? I have a ryzen 5 3600, 16gb of ram, 750w seasonic PSU and a 980 ti. Saving up money to upgrade to a 3070 here soon. Also have a dell 1440p 144hz monitor. All paid for by my job, no sugar daddy or parents here there bud ;* Guess who paid for it all, me ^_^ Please keep trying and crying about how you're broke and can't afford decent specs though princess
I bought my own pc actually using the money i make from my job. Wanna come up with any more asinine assumptions there edgelord??? You're trying really hard to be edgy for no reason. Did your daddy touch you too much??
Expensive lol? 16gb of ram is like 80$ and is the minimum anyone recommends to people who game. Also cost here is irrelevant. The commenter is acting like 8gb is a lot of ram. It's not, 32 or 64gb is a lot of ram
Yeah I get that 16gb may be the golden standard for most people nowdays, but you just can't afford 16gb of ram when you are from a 3rd world shithole working an awful job without saving alot, ykno? On top of that, this game doesn't even look that good, it seems like an overkill to honestly use so much ram, maybe he was suprised that a game like this uses so much ram?
Even though it's low graphically demanding there's probably a lot of shit to load etc, but yeah. I can understand that more how he originally phrased it
the game is very poorly optimized, the asking requirements are a joke, I've spent $4000 on my gaming rig to play games that are near it's requirements, like Ark in 2k maxed settings, does this look like it's comparable to Ark 2k maxed settings? no it doesn't, game is great concept and art, shitty execution though
I'm not sure you understand the concept of memory. Gameplay, objects loaded in, game mechanics and such is what would impact ram, not 3d models vs 2d sprites. That load would be handled by the GPU. Each object (zombie, wall item, furniture and so forth) would consume memory (ram).
if your having a hard time closing a window due to it creating dialogue popups, then you can try alt+f4(x2) to close the popup and window before it can create anymore prompts.
Ya it supports anything, you need a mouse, keyboard, monitor and any machine, you remote use some beast somewhere else on the planet. Only requirements are miniscule networking ones.
Kyo, is that a reference to the shitty french rock group for emos 10 years from here ? It's strange how a nickname can make me so angry and disrespectful to a guy I don't even know. But then I suppose if my nickname was something like "NickelbackRox" or "AceofBase4ever" and I was writing comments to tell people how they should think and write proprely, I would probably get some agressive answers at some points.
It's actually a good game but NORMAL zombies being bullet sponges is not good. 3 hits should be maximum for a gun unless u headshot,1 hit for a shotgun. And more gameplay and craft placing(like placing doors/turrets u crafted) improvements would be nice to see. So,first look is around score of total mediocrity 5/10 if bad points get nulled its a solid 7,5/10
keep in mind that ths is an early access game, it has an excuse to have issues steam users doesnt seem to see that however the game its now on red with reviews :/
Gamers now a days ask a lot of things, they keep asking for more. SPOILED BRAT KIDS TO YOUNG ADULT GAMERS! Let me add early access games in steam, players who gave it a bad review always forget that the game is still in alpha or early access stage. It is not a finished product. But those players keeps giving the game bad review because of those glitches without realizing that the game they are reviewing is still in early access. Those reviews should be also remove. Then they will keep saying it is not worth the price. STUPID SPOILED AND MORONIC PLAYERS! Give it a chance and time to improve. Stop saying the game is buggy because it is buggy. It should be reviewed in the point of view of what is the pros and cons of the game. It will help the programmer a lot. About the errors they should separate it with their review because those are the things the programmers needs to fix.
【Ⓒ】 Let me balance my realistic comment. In steam, user reviews are a lot better. There are many players there who will say but not usually the pros and cons of the game. They will say what they want and dislike about the game. But there are some people who will just say one sentence or less than 5 sentences why they dislike the game giving it a thumbs down. These are the bad reviews that steam should remove. Let me add Game Spot is as bad as IGN. Their reviews are not reviewed by hardcore players like us. Each game before giving a review, you should play it 1 to 2 weeks then the next week is for you work on long hours creating the review. Long game 2 weeks, short game 1 week. You have to play the game you will be reviewing for 5 - 8 hours a day short or long game. Their reviewers in Game Spot and IGN is like, the boss will just pick one of their workers to review the game even if that person do not play games, just a casual player or someone who does not do his or her work well. Their reviewers will give the game 8 - 9 - 10 calling it a masterpiece if they like the game but once they DISLIKE THE GAME, THEY WILL GIVE IT A CRAPPY SCORE IN WHICH THE GAME DOES NOT DESERVE IT. Metacritic could have been a good source of user reviews. First the reviewers there working on different webs and magazines some are good reviewers but half of them are bad the same like IGN and Game Spot. If they do not like the game it pisses them off and they did not bothered playing it for 1 to 2 weeks before giving it the proper score, immediately the game will receive around 4 - 6 out of 10 in which the actual score could be 7 or 8. Now the most shitty reviewers there are the user reviews. I said it could have been a good place to read reviews before buying games you like and its better to read user reviews than magazine or web reviews but there are many trolls there who discriminates the game, hating it and putting it down like what happened to Shenmue III, Ni No Kuni II and Zone Of The Enders: The 2nd Runner. They give the game 2 - 6 out of ten some give its 0! These reviewers should be filtered and banned. Those companies should hire workers, reviewers and players who are willing to review games not someone who will just play the game for one day not getting far in the game then tomorrow they will write a short review. A review less than 6 minutes even if the game requires more than 40 hours of game time to finish but the game needs at least 20 minutes of review time to cover a lot of things. Those companies must hire workers who will review are particular game genre then give them time to review the game 2 - 3 weeks and 1 week to work on the review to be published. These workers should be people who likes playing a particular genre because they have played a lot of those games so they know how to compare, differentiate and ultimately deliver a good review and a SCORE THE GAME DESERVES!
It's the dev's choice on when to release the game. If they release it early when it has a ton of bugs, they deserve the shitty reviews. If they release it with only a few bugs, they will get less shitty reviews but they will still be deserved. Reviews are the ultimate form of game rating, nobody should have to do what you say in order to rate a game. If somebody played the game, they have the right to vote whatever they want. Stop being a SJW just because some shit game you fantasize about isn't getting good reviews.
Senpai X FUCK YOU. My comment is not about do what I want because it is the way I want it to be or suppose to be. Did you read my whole comment before commenting? Let me nail this in your brain bub. There are positive reviews that are over rated and its not describing the game well so it does not deserve that positive review the same goes to negative reviews, people giving it negative review but also the game does not deserve it. There are real positive reviews then it should not be remove and negative reviews which are real because the game is ugly then it will not be remove. There is something we call oral defamation. Some games in steam are not well reviewed. I only said how to properly review the game before you give it negative or positive rating and its score do you understand that? I said it in DEEEEEETAAAAIL GREEAAAAAT DETAIL. Most people who gives negative reviews are people who disliked the game. If you do not like just say negative things in a constructive manner before giving it a negative score. You cannot keep playing games then because you do not like it you will give it a negative review do you think that is right HUUUH STUPID PRETTENDER NOT REALLY A SENPAI?
Steam have a "Useful" button next to a review for a reason. Useful reviews are pushed to the top while one-sentence shit takes are pushed to the bottom. Unless the reviewers personally target the dev then no, Steam should not remove any reviews, it's a direct violation of freedom of speech. Also, your take is pretty shit, "THE SCORE THE GAME DESERVES", yeah right, just like real life, no one owes you jack shit. Players dislike your game for one reason or another, they give you a bad score, simple. I agree that Early Access reviews should not be counted towards overall score, but the devs should have expected as much when putting their unfinished game up.
ItsOnlyDownhillFromhere Check your brain. Re-read everything I typed before you say my shit is shit. Your message is useless and what I typed is helpful. It is for the better not because I want something to be perfect. Your comment is not helpful, it is equal the to negative shitty reviews in steam.
Yo, did you just check out of the local asylum? You say some weird ass stuff dude. Your comment is useful? To who, exactly? This is a site for pirating games bud. I have no message, I simply said that what you want goes against anything Steam review or internet freedom of speech stands for, nothing "useless" or "useful" here as you put it. Again, no one owes a game a good review just because it's good. The fact that the person can make a review in the first place is because they bought the game, they gave it a fair shot, it didn't satisfy them one way or another -> they dislike it -> they give it a bad review, logic, ya following? I'm gonna leave you with an advice since you're so worked up about this topic, STOP LISTENING TO GAMING "JOURNALISTS" REVIEWS, and that includes Metacritic, if you want to check a game out, look it up on YT, watch more than 2 reviews with different takes on a game, preferably one negative and one positive.
ItsOnlyDownhillFromhere Like your ID, it suits your personality. You are buthurt when someone says the truth. GET A LIFE rather than minding others business that has nothing to do with you. YOU ARE SHIT LIKE THOSE REVIEWS!
Leave the internet for a while man, you're mental. Geez where did you learn those insults? The local grade school? You sure you're allowed within 5m of a school zone?
get 8.1 at least doggy 7 wont last the next year, not because its an easy target for virus thats bs, its mostly cuz most softwares will remove that OS from the list
I have no idea what the hell to do. I build a few ikea furnishings in a house that has 2 doors in an open space with poor natural defense choices. So I went to town and find another house. Setup shop in a stoned wall house with a second floor. Woke up after resting and a zombie spawns right outside and smashes through the door. Since it was midnight and dark as shit I died fast. Tried again with torches everywhere. Cool, I said as I run around with a shitty crossbow and found some girl who I tried talking but achieved nothing. Reminds me of my interaction with girls.
Managed to get my first NPC too. After tinkering with him for a bit, it looks like you can also teach or command NPCs in a similar vein to teaching monkeys from that The Survivalists game, but you also need to babysit them as well (in the form of their own Hunger, Thirst and Sleep bars) And yeah, the zombie re-spawn rate is atrocious, every house raid would always be like: (one-step-forward, one-step-back, one-step-forward, one-step-back, one-step-forward) on a loop.
My screen stop following my character once I open the tablet. I can't even play normally, I had to keep saving and re-entering the game to fix this problem.
Buggy, sometimes the game bugs out so you can no longer open your inventory, the menu, crafting etc. You can not even save anymore. But the game could be good once it get out of early access.
Is it like a simplified alternative to Project Zomboid? (which would be a good thing for me, when I don't have time to play long sessions)🤔 Edit : the developer says "it's The Walking Dead + Stardew Valley".😉
This is a good Zombies , Survival game , Its graphics is the graphics is charming , because its sharp and very clear and have great visual effects ( look how the grass move by the wind effect ) with a lot of details and its really nice . Its sound is good and Achieves its purpose but it need more music . Its control is bad actually , the looting is very interesting because You will not get boring from doing it because the game have a good grafting system and the way that You interact with Your atmosphere is a very satisfying . The way that the zombie's following You and try to killed You is perfect and unique in this game , But this game need a lot of work to make a good control with bugs and lag fixing and make it more balanced , ( Its like a port for a mobile game and the developer did not give it the attention that it deserve to make it suitable for a PC ) . If They do that , the game will be one of best Survival 2D games that You can played . Its early access now so We will wait and see what will happened . I download and play this demo from here , so the game works fine .
https://youtu.be/CrbtOY24itQ
^^ :D
People still play it
https://igg-games.com/corpse-mansion-free-download.html
extract the v0.4.08.06 version files again, but this time on its own folder and not on a previous game version folder
go to the folder where you dropped the files on the first time (i.e. the one where the previous version was i.e. the one you cant play because the character cant move)
Zelter_Data -> copy the folder dtb (this is where your save game files are)
go to v0.4.08.06 folder (the fresh one)
Zelter_Data -> drop the coppied dtb folder here
play the game from the new v0.4.08.06 folder (you can delete the previous version folder you used to play from)
I recommend doing this for every new update
copy your previous dtb folder to the new version folder
Confirmed:
From what I saw, it takes DirectX 10 and Windows 10 to work ... and I have Windows 7.
Thanks guys and more power.
"We are Gamers! We are A Family!"
Feel this one
https://igg-games.com/pc-game-046235489-request.html
-hmm wanna play this current version (4.05) tho...
BUT if this will stop on your 40days, nah..way~~
this game has serious potential. its game loop is crazy addictive i played it strait from start to unplayable without 1 single break. i got about 8 hours out of it. so you should treat this game as demo
try redownload it again if yours is perhaps interrupted
after all ~ still not full game but had potential.
if you have less than that you are very outdated son
no it's not you retard, it means the game has crap PC optimization not that 'muh more gbs = better' bs normies constantly spout on social media
and second its an early access game not a full gama release, you kids seems to dont understand the meaning of that
I would say you can actually run this game while having a lower amount of ram than suggested but expect it to run like shit.
I have job and responsibilites. It is obvious that the difference between you and me is that I do my own thing, unlike you, that you believe a lot with your cpu gamer that your parents have bought for you or your suggar daddy.
I have a ryzen 5 3600, 16gb of ram, 750w seasonic PSU and a 980 ti. Saving up money to upgrade to a 3070 here soon. Also have a dell 1440p 144hz monitor. All paid for by my job, no sugar daddy or parents here there bud ;*
Guess who paid for it all, me ^_^
Please keep trying and crying about how you're broke and can't afford decent specs though princess
Also cost here is irrelevant. The commenter is acting like 8gb is a lot of ram. It's not, 32 or 64gb is a lot of ram
On top of that, this game doesn't even look that good, it seems like an overkill to honestly use so much ram, maybe he was suprised that a game like this uses so much ram?
This game only works on Windows 10.
the add won't let me close.
It's strange how a nickname can make me so angry and disrespectful to a guy I don't even know.
But then I suppose if my nickname was something like "NickelbackRox" or "AceofBase4ever" and I was writing comments to tell people how they should think and write proprely, I would probably get some agressive answers at some points.
I do not know that rock band. If you are angry then release it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Msty4IO-tfc
This one looks even better.
3 hits should be maximum for a gun unless u headshot,1 hit for a shotgun.
And more gameplay and craft placing(like placing doors/turrets u crafted) improvements would be nice to see.
So,first look is around score of total mediocrity 5/10 if bad points get nulled its a solid 7,5/10
steam users doesnt seem to see that however
the game its now on red with reviews :/
Let me add early access games in steam, players who gave it a bad review always forget that the game is still in alpha or early access stage. It is not a finished product. But those players keeps giving the game bad review because of those glitches without realizing that the game they are reviewing is still in early access. Those reviews should be also remove. Then they will keep saying it is not worth the price. STUPID SPOILED AND MORONIC PLAYERS!
Give it a chance and time to improve. Stop saying the game is buggy because it is buggy. It should be reviewed in the point of view of what is the pros and cons of the game. It will help the programmer a lot.
About the errors they should separate it with their review because those are the things the programmers needs to fix.
Let me balance my realistic comment. In steam, user reviews are a lot better. There are many players there who will say but not usually the pros and cons of the game. They will say what they want and dislike about the game. But there are some people who will just say one sentence or less than 5 sentences why they dislike the game giving it a thumbs down. These are the bad reviews that steam should remove.
Let me add Game Spot is as bad as IGN. Their reviews are not reviewed by hardcore players like us. Each game before giving a review, you should play it 1 to 2 weeks then the next week is for you work on long hours creating the review. Long game 2 weeks, short game 1 week. You have to play the game you will be reviewing for 5 - 8 hours a day short or long game. Their reviewers in Game Spot and IGN is like, the boss will just pick one of their workers to review the game even if that person do not play games, just a casual player or someone who does not do his or her work well. Their reviewers will give the game 8 - 9 - 10 calling it a masterpiece if they like the game but once they DISLIKE THE GAME, THEY WILL GIVE IT A CRAPPY SCORE IN WHICH THE GAME DOES NOT DESERVE IT.
Metacritic could have been a good source of user reviews. First the reviewers there working on different webs and magazines some are good reviewers but half of them are bad the same like IGN and Game Spot. If they do not like the game it pisses them off and they did not bothered playing it for 1 to 2 weeks before giving it the proper score, immediately the game will receive around 4 - 6 out of 10 in which the actual score could be 7 or 8. Now the most shitty reviewers there are the user reviews. I said it could have been a good place to read reviews before buying games you like and its better to read user reviews than magazine or web reviews but there are many trolls there who discriminates the game, hating it and putting it down like what happened to Shenmue III, Ni No Kuni II and Zone Of The Enders: The 2nd Runner. They give the game 2 - 6 out of ten some give its 0! These reviewers should be filtered and banned.
Those companies should hire workers, reviewers and players who are willing to review games not someone who will just play the game for one day not getting far in the game then tomorrow they will write a short review. A review less than 6 minutes even if the game requires more than 40 hours of game time to finish but the game needs at least 20 minutes of review time to cover a lot of things. Those companies must hire workers who will review are particular game genre then give them time to review the game 2 - 3 weeks and 1 week to work on the review to be published. These workers should be people who likes playing a particular genre because they have played a lot of those games so they know how to compare, differentiate and ultimately deliver a good review and a SCORE THE GAME DESERVES!
FUCK YOU. My comment is not about do what I want because it is the way I want it to be or suppose to be.
Did you read my whole comment before commenting? Let me nail this in your brain bub. There are positive reviews that are over rated and its not describing the game well so it does not deserve that positive review the same goes to negative reviews, people giving it negative review but also the game does not deserve it. There are real positive reviews then it should not be remove and negative reviews which are real because the game is ugly then it will not be remove.
There is something we call oral defamation. Some games in steam are not well reviewed. I only said how to properly review the game before you give it negative or positive rating and its score do you understand that? I said it in DEEEEEETAAAAIL GREEAAAAAT DETAIL.
Most people who gives negative reviews are people who disliked the game. If you do not like just say negative things in a constructive manner before giving it a negative score.
You cannot keep playing games then because you do not like it you will give it a negative review do you think that is right HUUUH STUPID PRETTENDER NOT REALLY A SENPAI?
Check your brain. Re-read everything I typed before you say my shit is shit.
Your message is useless and what I typed is helpful. It is for the better not because I want something to be perfect.
Your comment is not helpful, it is equal the to negative shitty reviews in steam.
Like your ID, it suits your personality. You are buthurt when someone says the truth.
GET A LIFE rather than minding others business that has nothing to do with you.
YOU ARE SHIT LIKE THOSE REVIEWS!
You should leave alone the comments of others specially a very logical comment that your brain cannot comprehend.
i doubt anyone would like to read a huge sermon
Edit : Trying to run it on Windows 7, maybe that's the problem :/
7 wont last the next year, not because its an easy target for virus thats bs, its mostly cuz most softwares will remove that OS from the list
So I went to town and find another house. Setup shop in a stoned wall house with a second floor. Woke up after resting and a zombie spawns right outside and smashes through the door. Since it was midnight and dark as shit I died fast.
Tried again with torches everywhere. Cool, I said as I run around with a shitty crossbow and found some girl who I tried talking but achieved nothing. Reminds me of my interaction with girls.
And yeah, the zombie re-spawn rate is atrocious, every house raid would always be like: (one-step-forward, one-step-back, one-step-forward, one-step-back, one-step-forward) on a loop.
I can't even play normally, I had to keep saving and re-entering the game to fix this problem.
but i think it tcan be the nice game，if them have the Tutorials
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYhH_pwuWdU
But the game could be good once it get out of early access.
Edit : the developer says "it's The Walking Dead + Stardew Valley".😉
Everytime i see a potentially good game its a 6-10 chance that they are early access games.