I have the feeling prolifer don't even understand about what they are talking. "But should she be allowed to kill her son?" As long as he is inside of her, YES. and after he is born, there is something called adoption, remember? Stop cherry picking and develope some real empathy. The pregnancy is the problem. There is no alternative for abortion.
Pro-life people are well aware that the child is inside of the mother. Problem is that if the mother has the right to evict anyone living inside her body (even if that requires killing them), she would have the right to abort at 30 weeks if she wanted to not be pregnant and no nearby doctor was willing to perform a cesarean section or induce labour. That seems rather extreme.
If there's really no alternative to abortion then why is it that, according to the Turnaway Study (conducted and funded by abortion activists), 96% of women unable to have abortions are glad they had the baby five years after the fact? That's not cherrypicking. It seems like abortion can't be that essential of a procedure and there are viable alternatives available. Most of the justices on the Supreme Court seem to realize that.
I am pro-life, but i do believe in he exception for rape. It is not fair that the woman who did not consent to sex in the case of rape, is now forced by her body to gestate a pregnancy. The pro-life position is just too extreme to not allow exception for rape and has no empathy for the woman. It seems like the embroyo is treated with more empathy then the woman going to the trauma. I am a Christian, but i just cannot accept stopping a woman from having an abortion due to rape, it is cruel and inhumane to the woman
"But should she be allowed to kill her son?"
As long as he is inside of her, YES. and after he is born, there is something called adoption, remember? Stop cherry picking and develope some real empathy. The pregnancy is the problem. There is no alternative for abortion.
If there's really no alternative to abortion then why is it that, according to the Turnaway Study (conducted and funded by abortion activists), 96% of women unable to have abortions are glad they had the baby five years after the fact? That's not cherrypicking. It seems like abortion can't be that essential of a procedure and there are viable alternatives available. Most of the justices on the Supreme Court seem to realize that.